petek 19.april 2024 - 13:21 Informacije |
Razmere v gorah |
RSS podatki
Vseh zadnjih 20 prispevkov Iskanje po bazi podatkov
Novejši prispevki: (30)
|
Note 44.147 MOUNT-L 147 of 517 CUPIDO::STRITAR "Andrej Stritar,IJS,(61)-371-321" 31 lines 11-MAY-1993 15:20 CUPIDO::STRITAR "Andrej Stritar,IJS,(61)-371-321" 31 lines 11-MAY-1993 15:20 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Subj: USFS and USNPS Wilderness Areas Date: 11-May-1993 Posted-date: 11-May-1993 I have been on this list for the better part of six months and found the activity negligible. I am with Ken: Let's discuss or disappear. I grew up in South West Montana, so I am well acquainted with both the the Pintler and the Bob Marshall Widerness Areas. I have lived several years in several different locations of Alaska and have winessed first the dictatorial powers of the National Park Service, particularly in the Lake Clark, Denali and Gates of the Arctic. Neither the Forest Service not the National Park Service have instituted fees, regulations or procedures which have benefited the general public of the United States. In fact, their protective structures are so influenced by special interest groups as to make their future actions at best dubious. In every case that I am privy to, the fees and the regulations have been to the benefit of certain outfitters and guides operating at access locations to the areas. If you as a citizen are rich enough to pay a minimum of $1000 / day, the rules and regulations make sense. However, if you are a poor working stiff only interested in a few sojourns during a vacation for climbing, hiking, camping, fishing, etc., forget it. These areas are essentially unavailable. As a lover of mountains, wilderness and the solitude of outdoor life, I find the USFS and the USNPS obstacles rather facilitating these experiences. Walt Olson Michigan Technological University
|
***pico
3.145.191.22(0)
1136047 (636240,195,499612)
1098798 (615904,66,482828)
razmere.e-gora.si